<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 things that confuse me about twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.audioconnell.com/2009/10/22/3-things-that-confuse-me-about-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.audioconnell.com/2009/10/22/3-things-that-confuse-me-about-twitter/</link>
	<description>where the worlds of voiceover, marketing and advertising collide!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: peter o'connell voiceover</title>
		<link>http://blog.audioconnell.com/2009/10/22/3-things-that-confuse-me-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>peter o'connell voiceover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.audioconnell.com/?p=2797#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>Hi Brian:

I think for some people, garnering followers will always be a priority on line; my theory for that is because they&#039;ve have less success with that task in real life - again, just a theory.

And you know I had my first porno follower the other day. Sent me an @ message, couldn&#039;t tell anything was amiss from the name, I clicked on it and dove for the delete key when the screen popped up. And then I promptly laughed heartily.

Most fascinating in your response is how you&#039;ve created a disciplined tweet equation. I&#039;m not quite there yet - my rule is to stay out of conversations with folks I don&#039;t really know. But I like the way you think.

Best always,
- Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian:</p>
<p>I think for some people, garnering followers will always be a priority on line; my theory for that is because they&#8217;ve have less success with that task in real life &#8211; again, just a theory.</p>
<p>And you know I had my first porno follower the other day. Sent me an @ message, couldn&#8217;t tell anything was amiss from the name, I clicked on it and dove for the delete key when the screen popped up. And then I promptly laughed heartily.</p>
<p>Most fascinating in your response is how you&#8217;ve created a disciplined tweet equation. I&#8217;m not quite there yet &#8211; my rule is to stay out of conversations with folks I don&#8217;t really know. But I like the way you think.</p>
<p>Best always,<br />
- Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Haymond</title>
		<link>http://blog.audioconnell.com/2009/10/22/3-things-that-confuse-me-about-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-4436</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Haymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.audioconnell.com/?p=2797#comment-4436</guid>
		<description>Great topic, Peter.  I&#039;ll start with my &quot;peeve&quot;.  When I see someone has, let&#039;s say, 17,647 followers and is following about that many, I don&#039;t know that I will ever follow them.  Or those sites that say &quot;get more Twitter followers&quot;.  I&#039;m not in a contest with this thing.  I&#039;ve heard the news media speak of a video on YouTube as having been viewed 1 million times, and I understand that milestone, but the idea of &quot;trying&quot; to get as many followers as you can, that irks me a bit.

Other thoughts:

I block &quot;followers&quot; sometimes...I&#039;m not interested in spammers or porno folks following me.

I don&#039;t follow everyone, or most, who follow me.  I certainly hope I&#039;m not trampling good Twitter manners under foot.  I&#039;m shocked anyone would follow me in the first place and not sure why they do.  I never follow for the sake of following.  I read every tweet and, thus I follow only a relatively small number of folks.

Also, I personally try to follow a self-imposed 80/10/10 rule, whereby 80% of my tweets are in direct response to Twitter&#039;s question of: &quot;What are you doing?&quot;. Then 10% is committed to offering, hopefully, helpful information to those who follow and then the final approx. 10% is fun/friendly interactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great topic, Peter.  I&#8217;ll start with my &#8220;peeve&#8221;.  When I see someone has, let&#8217;s say, 17,647 followers and is following about that many, I don&#8217;t know that I will ever follow them.  Or those sites that say &#8220;get more Twitter followers&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not in a contest with this thing.  I&#8217;ve heard the news media speak of a video on YouTube as having been viewed 1 million times, and I understand that milestone, but the idea of &#8220;trying&#8221; to get as many followers as you can, that irks me a bit.</p>
<p>Other thoughts:</p>
<p>I block &#8220;followers&#8221; sometimes&#8230;I&#8217;m not interested in spammers or porno folks following me.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t follow everyone, or most, who follow me.  I certainly hope I&#8217;m not trampling good Twitter manners under foot.  I&#8217;m shocked anyone would follow me in the first place and not sure why they do.  I never follow for the sake of following.  I read every tweet and, thus I follow only a relatively small number of folks.</p>
<p>Also, I personally try to follow a self-imposed 80/10/10 rule, whereby 80% of my tweets are in direct response to Twitter&#8217;s question of: &#8220;What are you doing?&#8221;. Then 10% is committed to offering, hopefully, helpful information to those who follow and then the final approx. 10% is fun/friendly interactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

