Entries Tagged as ''

paris hilton for president

paris_hilton_for_president

“Ah, O’Connell me boy” you say (because you enjoy pretending your good at an Irish brogue when you’re not) “I think you’ve gone from Looney Tunes to Looney Bin.”

That’s true but it has nothing to do with my post.

See, John McCain, he of Republican presidential nominee fame, created an ad about the celebrity of Barack Obama, he of Democratic presidential nominee fame. This is the ad:

As you’ll note, one Paris Hilton, she of multiple sex tape fame and being rich (not necessarily in that order), was featured in the McCain ad…unbeknowst to her.

Our Paris didn’t like it. Somehow she teamed up with comedians at Will Ferrell, Adam McKay, and Chris Henchy’s Website “Funny or Die,” to create a brilliant, funny response shown here:

See more funny videos at Funny or Die

OK, you may mark your calendars with what I am about to say: Paris Hilton has impressed me with this presentation. She totally aced the subtle comedic performance.

I am not a fan of either McCain or Obama so if Paris is the only other choice, then I shall vote for her. At least she wears her vapidity on her sleeve.

Thanks for reading.

If you haven’t already, we’d be honored if you subscribe to voxmarketising – the audio’connell blog and podcast by clicking the “subscribe” button on this blog.

If you have previously subscribed, as of August 1, 2008 we’ve implemented a new RSS feed. Please update your subscription now in your reader because as of September 1, 2008, the old subscription feed will go away and we want you to stay!

If you really like this post (of course we hope you do), please feel free to bookmark and or promote it by clicking the buttons below on your preferred services.

press for mutual respect

With the internet and the recent advent and subsequent respect social media has received from influencers within major corporate and communication channels…there are a ton of ways for almost any business to get free publicity.

Note: if you think you’re not worthy of some press from your local paper or that you don’t have a story to tell…you’re probably wrong. You just haven’t worked hard enough at finding your story.

It takes a bit of study and work to gain the attention and respect of reporters because if you make a bad first impression on a reporter (you know, the overworked, underpaid guy or gal who has the power to get your story to the masses) you won’t be starting from zero the next time, you’ll absolutely be in negative numbers. Don’t stumble!

In spite of print media’s declining circulation, one would be unwise to discount beat reporters on their local papers or even larger papers (should your story warrant such coverage). Having a solid relationship with a reporter can mean the difference between your press release getting a one or two sentence mention in the smallish “Who’s News?” section of your paper and getting a full article with pictures. The same applies to TV and radio reporters as well. Those relationships could also be very valuable if bad news hits your business…you need the relationships in good times and in bad.

Are some reporters unworthy of respect? Sure. Some clients are too but you still gotta deal with them to achieve the desired goal: a pay day (or a press day).

The folks over at ragan.com put together a pretty smart starter list for how to deal with reporters. Read it here.

If all that still doesn’t make sense, then follow our rule: “Do unto others as you’d have done to you.” Most of the time if you treat reporters fairly, they’ll treat you fairly.

Let us know how successful you’ve been with the press and how you went about doing it.

Thanks for reading.

If you haven’t already, we’d be honored if you subscribe to voxmarketising – the audio’connell blog and podcast by clicking the “subscribe” button on this blog.

If you have previously subscribed, as of August 1, 2008 we’ve implemented a new RSS feed. Please update your subscription now in your reader because as of September 1, 2008, the old subscription feed will go away and we want you to stay!

If you really like this post (of course we hope you do), please feel free to bookmark and or promote it by clicking the buttons below on your preferred services.

because we all need a shot of motivation

I am not a disciple of Tony Robbins nor have I have been to his seminars.

I do however respect his intellectual and performance talent which I believe is on great display here (though you may want to watch this twice to absorb all the content).

Note there is a special guest Tony interacts with that you might not immediately recognize.

Enjoy.

Thanks for reading.

If you haven’t already, we’d be honored if you subscribe to voxmarketising – the audio’connell blog and podcast by clicking the “subscribe” button on this blog.

If you have previously subscribed, as of August 1, 2008 we’ve implemented a new RSS feed. Please update your subscription now in your reader because as of September 1, 2008, the old subscription feed will go away and we want you to stay!

If you really like this post (of course we hope you do), please feel free to bookmark and or promote it by clicking the buttons below on your preferred services.

when the outcome is failure

While we all experience degrees of failure in our professional and personal lives, it’s something we all (often painfully) understand. The higher the degree of failure, the greater the fall out or consequence. Sometimes we do the failing and sometimes someone fails us. It’s not always easy to determine which feels worse. Yet the weight failure brings with it certainly feels enormous.

Well how about if your failure was on a global scale? What if everybody knew about it, hundreds of millions of dollars were at stake and people got hurt…if not physically than certainly financially. What do you think your reaction would be?

What if it was your name, your personal brand that got wrapped up in the failure of your corporate brand?

Oh and your husband left you in the same week your company publicly failed.

Eight years later, this lady is still trying to climb out of the ashes. Read how she’s doing.

Then share your thoughts on her experience or if you want to be really brave, how you have over come a pretty public failure.

Thanks for reading.

If you haven’t already, we’d be honored if you subscribe to voxmarketising – the audio’connell blog and podcast by clicking the “subscribe” button on this blog.

If you have previously subscribed, as of August 1, 2008 we’ve implemented a new RSS feed. Please update your subscription now in your reader because as of September 1, 2008, the old subscription feed will go away and we want you to stay!

If you really like this post (of course we hope you do), please feel free to bookmark and or promote it by clicking the buttons below on your preferred services.

screwing with your voiceover brand

Every business has a brand and as Mitch Joel will tell you, every individual has a personal brand.

In the case of voice over, most folks are one person shops so the individual voice talent is often the brand. And by virtue of their sole proprietorship, their personal brand is often front and center.

BRAND = PROFITS

How prospective clients and even the general business community or passersby view your brand impacts your bottom line. You’ve got to understand this as fact. If you don’t, the rest of this post will be meaningless.

We are only aware of about 1/3 of the opinions people have of our brands (my very rough estimate, no science here) meaning that 66% of opinions on our brand – that thing on which we base our livelihoods – never makes it back to us.

We don’t know what potential clients are saying about our brand – personal or otherwise (yikes!) – which is why we must be ardent stewards of our own brands.

So when I see web examples of really poor branding (in my opinion) my head starts to throb. Not in anger or anything like that -more like pity because I know that I am hardly the only person who’s noticed these mis-steps. And they are too often so easy to fix/avoid.

LET’S SEE THE BODIES

Now of course, you want to see (and thereby have me “out”) the sites and their owners I will reference here because you’re also the person who slows down to gawk at accidents, I know. Well no dice.

It’s hurtful to single out someone specifically and that’s not my goal nor is it the point of this post.

“But,” you ask, “isn’t it hurtful to speak badly about a person’s branding even vaguely?”

Yes which is why I won’t be speaking badly about anyone. I will be pointing out mis-steps in branding and design which you can be sure to avoid. I will do this without specifically “brand-spanking” the sites that incited this post (I call copyright on brand spanking!).

“Yet by not being specific, aren’t you speaking behind their back, you backstabbing bastard?!”

Firstly, watch your language, potty mouth 😉 . Second, the point here is to get everyone to look at their own web sites and branding more critically. For some readers, the concept of branding is totally new. If you see some of yourself in any of my forthcoming comments, get offended if you wish but that would just be a waste of time. Rather see if you might want to at least think of revising your branding or presentation. Branding is an ever evolving process anyway…on-going analysis is always good.

CLUTTER IS NOT CONTENT

The first site is from a fairly well know media professional and educator. The site looks like it was designed in 1997 and really hasn’t changed much. There’s a blog that isn’t really a blog, text in sooooo many different colors that the Rainbow Coalition may sue for copyright infringement and its almost nothing but miles and miles of copy in 8 point font. It is jumbled and disorganized (to the eye) and if there is great content somewhere in there, you’ll burn your retinas trying to find it.

Note I said this media professional is an educator – credibility must be one of the hallmarks of his/her brand. Smart and somewhat sophisticated must be some of the other immediate impressions. They seem to be using a do-it-yourself web program and have put no thought into web design. Bad idea.

Based on this site, I could never train with this person even if they were the Albert Einstein of voice over. It would never be apparent how talented they might be. And isn’t that the saddest part of all…one who might be enormously talented gets ignored because (personal opinion only) their brand, their persona sucks?

Ours is not a bricks and mortar business, as it used to be. Often the web is the building. The wrapping paper matters and assuming that using the Sunday comics will be good enough for a web design (as is the impression I get with this person’s really bad design choices) well, that is a really bad plan for branding.

Simple, clean, uncluttered design is best. Among the most simple and effective voice web site designs out there are Bruce Miles and Dan Nachtrab. Certainly, their great voices are what sell you but their personal branding is professional – in two very different ways. Both enjoy good SEO success too.

BRANDING AND POSITIONING

Now let’s chat for a minute about how you position yourself in the voice over market place and how that fits into branding. This is going to be a sensitive area for a lot of industry people because the site I saw tonight positioned itself on being one the cheapest voice over service out there. They said they were “good” but their primary point of difference was low price – clear as a bell.

Point of fact, not opinion: every business has a low cost provider and there’s money to be made in them thar hills. Full disclosure (more on the opinion side of the fence here): I have a tremendous bias against such providers in any business because I think it lessens the value of an industry. And (completing the disclosure) I have, on occasion, shopped at Wal-Mart.

I think that low ball providers in voiceover are so bad because technology has given birth to thousands of talentless hacks who think they are voice talents and are willing (it seems, anyway) to pay their clients to let them do their voice work. “Cheap” is becoming synonymous (if not a standard expectation) with the voice over industry and that devalues everyone’s product. (Let the battle begin on that little paragraph).

The individual whose site I referenced this post was not talentless. The voice I heard was a fine radio voice doing spots – nothing bad there. The design was not awful either. It wasn’t inspiring but it did seem functional and that won’t hurt his branding. The mis-spellings on the copy might (says this author, who is a terrible proofreader) .

POINT OF DIFFERENCE

Back to the brand’s major point of difference: cheap. While maybe profitable volumetrically (and God bless ’em for putting food on the table – that part I get and respect) I heard a level of client on the demos and saw a level of client in the testimonials that I kind of expected. Not exactly Chico’s Bail Bonds (that of “Bad News Bears” fame) but in the neighborhood. When you say you’re the cheapest, there will always be a certain client you attract – and many more you won’t.

Check the synonyms for the word “cheap”. I don’t want to be high priced Harry but I know the value of my talent and of my brand. Cheap and its associated meanings are not something I think are worth promoting. There are tons of branding options – stay away from cheap.

Thanks for reading.

If you haven’t already, we’d be honored if you subscribe to voxmarketising – the audio’connell blog and podcast by clicking the “subscribe” button on this blog.

If you have previously subscribed, as of August 1, 2008 we’ve implemented a new RSS feed. Please update your subscription now in your reader because as of September 1, 2008, the old subscription feed will go away and we want you to stay!

If you really like this post (of course we hope you do), please feel free to bookmark and or promote it by clicking the buttons below on your preferred services.

subscribe and save*

Mark your calendars for September 1, 2008. You NEED to know this date.

Why?

BECAUSE that’s the date we will be changing this blog’s current RSS feed address exclusively to a Feed Burner subscription address.

For subscribers and potential subscribers its an easy more effective way to subscribe. For voxmarketising (we, us, me), it offers better analytics. There will be no major change in what you see and the writing will remain as unreadable as always. You will also be notified when and if we ever publish another voxmarketising podcast with this feed (oy, are we behind on THAT!)

YOUR JOB NOW is to delete the old RSS address in your reader and click on that big bright orange button on the right hand corner of the blog that says “subscribe to the new RSS feed”.

See it up there?

I just did it in about 15-20 seconds. And you’re probably more coordinated that I am so for you it won’t even take that long.

For the next 30 days, we’ll keep both subscriptions available but as of September 1st, subscription notices will ONLY GO TO FEEDBURNER SUBSCRIBERS.

We hope you’ll make the switch with us…we’d miss you terribly if you left. (*Oh, and there really isn’t any kind of savings in this for you, as the title suggests. That was just an ugly marketing ploy to draw you in.)

And for those of you who think RSS stands for “Really Smelly Sink” (and you know who you are) here is a classic video from our friends at Common Craft to explain what RSS really is.